Two things in common with these speakers, first, they favoured thin wall and "breathable" speaker enclosure and second, they do not favour damping materials. They make the resonance works for them instead of eliminating it. Fascinating?
In order to achieve the desired results, these speakers require intensive painstaking skill to make them. Rather artisan than utilitarian in approach and high labour cost, hence, they aren't actually economies of scale. They hardly cheap. Cost performance is very subjective.
Bosendorfer VC7 |
Ocellia with PHY-PH driver |
Kiso HB1 |
Triangle Electroacoustique |
Antonio Stradivarius |
Hi tech costs $$$ |
And for most of us, Average Joe, will have sit back and accept the compromises and imperfections. And wait for the economies of scale that the price will eventually be more friendly. God has given us the best tool, our hearing. Aunties and uncles can tell good sound too. So, beware of those expensive speakers that measure good but does not sound good.
One thing that do concern me, these tuning and resonance controls are only effective on limited frequency range.
O yes! Resonance control it is. The ancient maestro voice their musical instrument by playing around with resonances. They curb them with shape, size and the choice of enclosure construction. Resonance is like cholesterol, there are good ones and bad ones. Instead of total elimination, they voice with resonance. And so, a bold idea popped up in my head, to assume my room as the body of a musical instrument and work with the resonance.
Room will add gain to any speaker loudness. You will never get a linear response across the whole frequency response. An in room peak at 40-60Hz is inevitable. You can use electronic room EQ like XTZ room analyzer, Roomperfect, Tact room correction or DEQX to ameliorate the room response. I got nothing to report because I'm not Mr Tell It All.
Look, the cones at work |
Admittedly, I'm a cheap bastard. The story begins with Dr Mimosa telling me that applying brass cones will do wonder to the bass. Skeptical I may be, I jumped on it because the cones do not cost me a lot of money, furthermore, I do have some cones readily for my disposal.
The great thing about this tweak is the versatility, that accords flexibility. It boils down to your sensitivity to tone, details and phase. Don't blame me if you can not hear the effects. It is fairly easy to depict the effects. Place the two inch cones two to three inch from the front wall, the bass character per distance is personal preference. If you find too boomy at one side, place additional cones around will help, you may also want to try stick the cone on the wall too. The later proved to be difficult due to the mass of the cone. I doubt that any commercial available adhesives can do the job. It is not a good idea to apply permanent bonding and you might want to experiment more.
Is your bass like a punctured ball? |
A perfect dive, minimal splashes |
Placing the cones at outward of the speakers determines the soundstage. Move the cones along outer side the speakers and hear the difference. I will not feed you findings, you ought to explore and enjoy the fun of exploration. This is part of the audio fun.
Steel cone is most lively, brass is lesser.
In principal, spikes/cones with the greater in height will have an effect on the higher frequency ranges and more livelier.
Crystal ball |
You will very happy with the results and thank me for sharing.
No comments:
Post a Comment